Coronado 35 vs Hughes 36
How do the Coronado 35 and Hughes 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Coronado 35 
Hughes 36 | Coronado 35 | Hughes 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.3 ft10.74 m | 35.3 ft10.74 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Beam | 10.1 ft3.07 m | 10.1 ft3.07 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 13,000 lb5,897 kg | 13,000 lb5,897 kg |
| Ballast | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 4,700 lb2,132 kg |
| Sail area | 454 ft²42.2 m² | 500 ft²46.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.14 | 14.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 279 | 279 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 31.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Coronado 35 vs Hughes 36: the short version
- The Coronado 35 and Hughes 36 are close in length (35.3 ft10.74 m vs 35.3 ft10.74 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hughes 36 carries the more powerful rig (14.5 vs 13.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hughes 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hughes 36 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.71).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.