Coronado 35 vs Island Packet 35
How do the Coronado 35 and Island Packet 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Coronado 35 
Island Packet 35 | Coronado 35 | Island Packet 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.3 ft10.74 m | 35.3 ft10.77 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 10.1 ft3.07 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 13,000 lb5,897 kg | 17,500 lb7,938 kg |
| Ballast | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 454 ft²42.2 m² | 639 ft²59.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.14 | 15.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 279 | 289 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 31.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.3 |
Coronado 35 vs Island Packet 35: the short version
- The Coronado 35 and Island Packet 35 are close in length (35.3 ft10.74 m vs 35.3 ft10.77 m ).
- The Island Packet 35 is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Island Packet 35 carries the more powerful rig (15.2 vs 13.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Island Packet 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Coronado 35 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.