Coronado 35 vs Southern Cross 35
How do the Coronado 35 and Southern Cross 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Coronado 35 
Southern Cross 35 | Coronado 35 | Southern Cross 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.3 ft10.74 m | 35.3 ft10.74 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Beam | 10.1 ft3.07 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 13,000 lb5,897 kg | 17,700 lb8,029 kg |
| Ballast | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 5,750 lb2,608 kg |
| Sail area | 454 ft²42.2 m² | 627 ft²58.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.14 | 14.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 279 | 360 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 35.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.1 |
Coronado 35 vs Southern Cross 35: the short version
- The Coronado 35 and Southern Cross 35 are close in length (35.3 ft10.74 m vs 35.3 ft10.74 m ).
- The Southern Cross 35 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Southern Cross 35 carries the more powerful rig (14.8 vs 13.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Southern Cross 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Coronado 35 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.75).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.