Corvette 31 vs Maxi 95
How do the Corvette 31 and Maxi 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Corvette 31 
Maxi 95 | Corvette 31 | Maxi 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.2 ft9.50 m | 31.2 ft9.50 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.77 m | 10.4 ft3.16 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 8,545 lb3,876 kg | 11,023 lb5,000 kg |
| Ballast | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Sail area | 444 ft²41.2 m² | 506 ft²47.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.00 | 16.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 294 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.9 | 27.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Average used price | — | €18,000 |
Corvette 31 vs Maxi 95: the short version
- The Corvette 31 and Maxi 95 are close in length (31.2 ft9.50 m vs 31.2 ft9.50 m ).
- The Maxi 95 is heavier, displacing about 29% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Corvette 31 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Corvette 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corvette 31 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.