Corvette 31 vs Sprint 95
How do the Corvette 31 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Corvette 31 C&C Yachts at the Belleville Marine Yard (Morch Marine) · 1965 
Sprint 95 Archambault Boats · 1989 | Corvette 31 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.2 ft9.50 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.77 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 8,545 lb3,876 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 444 ft²41.2 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 17.00 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.9 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 7.0 |
Corvette 31 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Corvette 31 and Sprint 95 are close in length (31.2 ft9.50 m vs 31.1 ft9.48 m ).
- The Corvette 31 is heavier, displacing about 73% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Corvette 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corvette 31 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.