CPT TCS vs Howmar 12
How do the CPT TCS and Howmar 12 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CPT TCS | CPT TCS | Howmar 12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.2 ft3.72 m | 12.2 ft3.71 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 10.4 ft3.18 m |
| Beam | 2.3 ft0.70 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Draft | —— | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 39 lb18 kg | 175 lb79 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 90 ft²8.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 46.03 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 69 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 2.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.71 | 3.58 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.3 |
CPT TCS vs Howmar 12: the short version
- The CPT TCS and Howmar 12 are close in length (12.2 ft3.72 m vs 12.2 ft3.71 m ).
- The Howmar 12 is heavier, displacing about 349% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the CPT TCS rates better for offshore work (2.71 vs 3.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.