Crealock 37 vs Dickerson 37
How do the Crealock 37 and Dickerson 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crealock 37 | Crealock 37 | Dickerson 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.9 ft11.25 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.30 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 16,200 lb7,348 kg | 15,950 lb7,235 kg |
| Ballast | 6,200 lb2,812 kg | 5,850 lb2,654 kg |
| Sail area | 621 ft²57.7 m² | 556 ft²51.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.52 | 14.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 338 | 297 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.4 | 30.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.2 |
Crealock 37 vs Dickerson 37: the short version
- The Crealock 37 and Dickerson 37 are close in length (36.9 ft11.25 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Crealock 37 carries the more powerful rig (15.5 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Crealock 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crealock 37 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.