Crealock 37 vs Seidelmann 37
How do the Crealock 37 and Seidelmann 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crealock 37 | Crealock 37 | Seidelmann 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.9 ft11.25 m | 36.8 ft11.23 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.30 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 16,200 lb7,348 kg | 12,000 lb5,443 kg |
| Ballast | 6,200 lb2,812 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 621 ft²57.7 m² | 643 ft²59.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.52 | 19.63 |
| Displacement / Length | 338 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.4 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.5 |
Crealock 37 vs Seidelmann 37: the short version
- The Crealock 37 and Seidelmann 37 are close in length (36.9 ft11.25 m vs 36.8 ft11.23 m ).
- The Crealock 37 is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Seidelmann 37 carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Crealock 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crealock 37 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.