Creekmore 34 vs M34
How do the Creekmore 34 and M34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Creekmore 34 
M34 | Creekmore 34 | M34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.0 ft10.36 m | 34.0 ft10.36 m |
| Waterline length | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 33.1 ft10.08 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 9.8 ft2.97 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Displacement | 17,000 lb7,711 kg | 5,952 lb2,700 kg |
| Ballast | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 2,315 lb1,050 kg |
| Sail area | 589 ft²54.7 m² | 764 ft²71.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.25 | 37.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 296 | 73 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.9 | 13.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.79 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.7 |
Creekmore 34 vs M34: the short version
- The Creekmore 34 and M34 are close in length (34.0 ft10.36 m vs 34.0 ft10.36 m ).
- The Creekmore 34 is heavier, displacing about 186% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the M34 carries the more powerful rig (37.2 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Creekmore 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Creekmore 34 rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.