Creekmore 34 vs Sun Odyssey 349
How do the Creekmore 34 and Sun Odyssey 349 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Creekmore 34 
Sun Odyssey 349 | Creekmore 34 | Sun Odyssey 349 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.0 ft10.36 m | 33.9 ft10.34 m |
| Waterline length | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 30.8 ft9.40 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 11.3 ft3.44 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 17,000 lb7,711 kg | 11,795 lb5,350 kg |
| Ballast | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 3,483 lb1,580 kg |
| Sail area | 589 ft²54.7 m² | 547 ft²50.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.25 | 16.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 296 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.9 | 22.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.79 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.4 |
Creekmore 34 vs Sun Odyssey 349: the short version
- The Creekmore 34 and Sun Odyssey 349 are close in length (34.0 ft10.36 m vs 33.9 ft10.34 m ).
- The Creekmore 34 is heavier, displacing about 44% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sun Odyssey 349 carries the more powerful rig (16.9 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Creekmore 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Creekmore 34 rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.