Crit 270 vs Hookipa Naish
How do the Crit 270 and Hookipa Naish compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crit 270 | Crit 270 | Hookipa Naish | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 1.8 ft0.56 m | 1.9 ft0.57 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 20 lb9 kg | 18 lb8 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.71 | 2.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Crit 270 vs Hookipa Naish: the short version
- The Crit 270 and Hookipa Naish are close in length (8.9 ft2.70 m vs 8.5 ft2.60 m ).
- The Crit 270 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crit 270 rates better for offshore work (2.71 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.