Crown 23 vs Farrier F-22
How do the Crown 23 and Farrier F-22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crown 23 
Farrier F-22 | Crown 23 | Farrier F-22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 22.9 ft6.99 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Beam | 7.7 ft2.34 m | 18.1 ft5.51 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.24 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 3,800 lb1,724 kg | 1,300 lb590 kg |
| Ballast | 1,550 lb703 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 269 ft²25.0 m² | 328 ft²30.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.67 | 44.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 229 | 53 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.9 | 1.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 6.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Crown 23 vs Farrier F-22: the short version
- The Crown 23 and Farrier F-22 are close in length (23.0 ft7.01 m vs 22.9 ft6.99 m ).
- The Crown 23 is heavier, displacing about 192% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Farrier F-22 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 17.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Crown 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crown 23 rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 6.63).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.