Crown 28 vs ETAP 28
How do the Crown 28 and ETAP 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crown 28 
ETAP 28 | Crown 28 | ETAP 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 27.6 ft8.42 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.11 m | 22.7 ft6.91 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.69 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.47 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 6,700 lb3,039 kg | 6,610 lb2,998 kg |
| Ballast | 2,900 lb1,315 kg | 2,557 lb1,160 kg |
| Sail area | 372 ft²34.6 m² | 319 ft²29.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.75 | 14.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 236 | 253 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.1 | 19.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 2.13 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Crown 28 vs ETAP 28: the short version
- The Crown 28 and ETAP 28 are close in length (27.8 ft8.46 m vs 27.6 ft8.42 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Crown 28 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 14.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Crown 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crown 28 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.