Crown 28 vs Hunter 280
How do the Crown 28 and Hunter 280 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crown 28 
Hunter 280 | Crown 28 | Hunter 280 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.11 m | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.69 m | 9.6 ft2.94 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.47 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 6,700 lb3,039 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Ballast | 2,900 lb1,315 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Sail area | 372 ft²34.6 m² | 338 ft²31.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.75 | 15.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 236 | 221 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.1 | 19.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Crown 28 vs Hunter 280: the short version
- The Crown 28 and Hunter 280 are close in length (27.8 ft8.46 m vs 27.8 ft8.46 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Crown 28 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Crown 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crown 28 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.