Crown 34 vs Hans Christian 33
How do the Crown 34 and Hans Christian 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crown 34 | Crown 34 | Hans Christian 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.8 ft10.30 m | 33.8 ft10.29 m |
| Waterline length | 27.9 ft8.51 m | 29.2 ft8.89 m |
| Beam | 10.9 ft3.33 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 19,000 lb8,618 kg |
| Ballast | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 6,300 lb2,858 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 600 ft²55.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.22 | 13.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 215 | 342 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.6 | 36.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.2 |
Crown 34 vs Hans Christian 33: the short version
- The Crown 34 and Hans Christian 33 are close in length (33.8 ft10.30 m vs 33.8 ft10.29 m ).
- The Hans Christian 33 is heavier, displacing about 81% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Crown 34 carries the more powerful rig (18.2 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hans Christian 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hans Christian 33 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.