Crown 34 vs Hunter 340
How do the Crown 34 and Hunter 340 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Crown 34 | Crown 34 | Hunter 340 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.8 ft10.30 m | 33.8 ft10.29 m |
| Waterline length | 27.9 ft8.51 m | 28.6 ft8.71 m |
| Beam | 10.9 ft3.33 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 11,030 lb5,003 kg |
| Ballast | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 4,100 lb1,860 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 599 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.22 | 19.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 215 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.6 | 21.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.2 |
Crown 34 vs Hunter 340: the short version
- The Crown 34 and Hunter 340 are close in length (33.8 ft10.30 m vs 33.8 ft10.29 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 340 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 18.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Crown 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crown 34 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.