CS 22 vs CS 30
How do the CS 22 and CS 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 22 
CS 30 | CS 22 | CS 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 10.3 ft3.12 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 3,440 lb1,560 kg |
| Sail area | 194 ft²18.0 m² | 462 ft²42.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.35 | 18.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.4 | 20.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 6.8 |
CS 22 vs CS 30: the short version
- The CS 30 is the larger boat at 30.0 ft9.14 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.58 m for the CS 22.
- The CS 30 is heavier, displacing about 264% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 30 carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 30 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.