CS 22 vs CS 395
How do the CS 22 and CS 395 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 22 
CS 395 | CS 22 | CS 395 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 40.1 ft12.24 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 31.1 ft9.49 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 12.7 ft3.87 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 7.3 ft2.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 12,786 lb5,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 5,644 lb2,560 kg |
| Sail area | 194 ft²18.0 m² | 747 ft²69.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.35 | 21.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 189 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.4 | 19.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 7.5 |
CS 22 vs CS 395: the short version
- The CS 395 is the larger boat at 40.1 ft12.24 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.58 m for the CS 22.
- The CS 395 is heavier, displacing about 481% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 395 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 395 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 395 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.