CS 22 vs Spindrift 22
How do the CS 22 and Spindrift 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 22 
Spindrift 22 | CS 22 | Spindrift 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 19.1 ft5.82 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 1,990 lb903 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 194 ft²18.0 m² | 194 ft²18.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.35 | 19.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 128 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.4 | 9.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.9 |
CS 22 vs Spindrift 22: the short version
- The CS 22 and Spindrift 22 are close in length (21.6 ft6.58 m vs 21.5 ft6.55 m ).
- The CS 22 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Spindrift 22 carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 22 rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 2.59).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.