CS 27 vs Halman Horizon
How do the CS 27 and Halman Horizon compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 27 
Halman Horizon | CS 27 | Halman Horizon | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Waterline length | 23.9 ft7.29 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 9.7 ft2.95 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.58 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 6,100 lb2,767 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 2,400 lb1,089 kg | 2,250 lb1,021 kg |
| Sail area | 341 ft²31.7 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 16.34 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 199 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.4 | 21.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.4 |
CS 27 vs Halman Horizon: the short version
- The CS 27 and Halman Horizon are close in length (27.0 ft8.23 m vs 27.0 ft8.23 m ).
- The Halman Horizon is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Halman Horizon scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Halman Horizon rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.