CS 27 vs Hotfoot 27
How do the CS 27 and Hotfoot 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 27 
Hotfoot 27 | CS 27 | Hotfoot 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Waterline length | 23.9 ft7.29 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.58 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 6,100 lb2,767 kg | 3,600 lb1,633 kg |
| Ballast | 2,400 lb1,089 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 341 ft²31.7 m² | 347 ft²32.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.34 | 23.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 199 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.4 | 12.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.3 |
CS 27 vs Hotfoot 27: the short version
- The CS 27 and Hotfoot 27 are close in length (27.0 ft8.23 m vs 27.0 ft8.23 m ).
- The CS 27 is heavier, displacing about 69% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hotfoot 27 carries the more powerful rig (23.6 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 27 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.