CS 33 vs CS 36
How do the CS 33 and CS 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 33 
CS 36 | CS 33 | CS 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.7 ft9.96 m | 36.5 ft11.13 m |
| Waterline length | 26.4 ft8.05 m | 29.3 ft8.92 m |
| Beam | 10.7 ft3.25 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.77 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 10,000 lb4,536 kg | 15,500 lb7,031 kg |
| Ballast | 4,250 lb1,928 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Sail area | 503 ft²46.7 m² | 640 ft²59.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.34 | 16.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 242 | 277 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.3 | 29.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.98 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.2 |
CS 33 vs CS 36: the short version
- The CS 36 is the larger boat at 36.5 ft11.13 m LOA versus 32.7 ft9.96 m for the CS 33.
- The CS 36 is heavier, displacing about 55% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 33 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 36 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.