CS 33 vs CS 50
How do the CS 33 and CS 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 33 
CS 50 | CS 33 | CS 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.7 ft9.96 m | 49.9 ft15.20 m |
| Waterline length | 26.4 ft8.05 m | 38.4 ft11.70 m |
| Beam | 10.7 ft3.25 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.77 m | 8.7 ft2.64 m |
| Displacement | 10,000 lb4,536 kg | 27,557 lb12,500 kg |
| Ballast | 4,250 lb1,928 kg | 12,125 lb5,500 kg |
| Sail area | 503 ft²46.7 m² | 1,390 ft²129.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.34 | 24.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 242 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.3 | 29.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.98 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 8.3 |
CS 33 vs CS 50: the short version
- The CS 50 is the larger boat at 49.9 ft15.20 m LOA versus 32.7 ft9.96 m for the CS 33.
- The CS 50 is heavier, displacing about 176% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 50 carries the more powerful rig (24.4 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 50 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 50 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.