CS 34 vs CS 50
How do the CS 34 and CS 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 34 | CS 34 | CS 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.5 ft10.21 m | 49.9 ft15.20 m |
| Waterline length | 27.7 ft8.43 m | 38.4 ft11.70 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.43 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 8.7 ft2.64 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 27,557 lb12,500 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 12,125 lb5,500 kg |
| Sail area | 533 ft²49.5 m² | 1,390 ft²129.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.79 | 24.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 221 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.0 | 29.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 8.3 |
CS 34 vs CS 50: the short version
- The CS 50 is the larger boat at 49.9 ft15.20 m LOA versus 33.5 ft10.21 m for the CS 34.
- The CS 50 is heavier, displacing about 162% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 50 carries the more powerful rig (24.4 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 50 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 50 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.