CS 36 Merlin vs Vancouver 36
How do the CS 36 Merlin and Vancouver 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 36 Merlin | CS 36 Merlin | Vancouver 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.0 ft10.97 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 27.9 ft8.51 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 11.0 ft3.35 m |
| Draft | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 13,000 lb5,897 kg | 18,052 lb8,188 kg |
| Ballast | 5,590 lb2,536 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 608 ft²56.5 m² | 685 ft²63.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.60 | 15.93 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 370 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.9 | 37.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 1.68 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.1 |
CS 36 Merlin vs Vancouver 36: the short version
- The CS 36 Merlin and Vancouver 36 are close in length (36.0 ft10.97 m vs 36.0 ft10.97 m ).
- The Vancouver 36 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 36 Merlin carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Vancouver 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Vancouver 36 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.