CS 36 vs Dockrell 37
How do the CS 36 and Dockrell 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 36 
Dockrell 37 | CS 36 | Dockrell 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.5 ft11.13 m | 36.5 ft11.13 m |
| Waterline length | 29.3 ft8.92 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Displacement | 15,500 lb7,031 kg | 16,000 lb7,257 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 640 ft²59.5 m² | 492 ft²45.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.47 | 12.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 277 | 265 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.5 | 35.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.3 |
CS 36 vs Dockrell 37: the short version
- The CS 36 and Dockrell 37 are close in length (36.5 ft11.13 m vs 36.5 ft11.13 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the CS 36 carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dockrell 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dockrell 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.