Cumulus 28 vs Marieholm 28 (281)
How do the Cumulus 28 and Marieholm 28 (281) compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cumulus 28 | Cumulus 28 | Marieholm 28 (281) | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.81 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 9.7 ft2.94 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 7,055 lb3,200 kg | 8,378 lb3,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,812 lb1,276 kg | 3,417 lb1,550 kg |
| Sail area | 363 ft²33.7 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.79 | 17.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 283 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 25.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | — | €9,800 |
Cumulus 28 vs Marieholm 28 (281): the short version
- The Cumulus 28 and Marieholm 28 (281) are close in length (28.1 ft8.56 m vs 28.1 ft8.56 m ).
- The Marieholm 28 (281) is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marieholm 28 (281) carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marieholm 28 (281) scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm 28 (281) rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 1.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.