Cumulus 28 vs Omega 28
How do the Cumulus 28 and Omega 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cumulus 28 | Cumulus 28 | Omega 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 28.1 ft8.57 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.81 m | 22.3 ft6.80 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 9.6 ft2.93 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 7,055 lb3,200 kg | 5,952 lb2,700 kg |
| Ballast | 2,812 lb1,276 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 363 ft²33.7 m² | 441 ft²41.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.79 | 21.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 283 | 239 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 2.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | — | €7,100 |
Cumulus 28 vs Omega 28: the short version
- The Cumulus 28 and Omega 28 are close in length (28.1 ft8.56 m vs 28.1 ft8.57 m ).
- The Cumulus 28 is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Omega 28 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cumulus 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cumulus 28 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.