Cup One vs Oceanite Gulf
How do the Cup One and Oceanite Gulf compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cup One | Cup One | Oceanite Gulf | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.6 ft3.85 m | 12.6 ft3.85 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.0 ft0.62 m | 2.1 ft0.64 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 35 lb16 kg | 47 lb21 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.48 | 2.33 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Cup One vs Oceanite Gulf: the short version
- The Cup One and Oceanite Gulf are close in length (12.6 ft3.85 m vs 12.6 ft3.85 m ).
- The Oceanite Gulf is heavier, displacing about 34% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Oceanite Gulf rates better for offshore work (2.33 vs 2.48).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.