Dana 24 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24
How do the Dana 24 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dana 24 
Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 | Dana 24 | Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.2 ft7.36 m | 24.1 ft7.35 m |
| Waterline length | 21.4 ft6.53 m | 19.9 ft6.05 m |
| Beam | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 7,400 lb3,357 kg | 4,079 lb1,850 kg |
| Ballast | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 360 ft²33.4 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.17 | 18.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 336 | 233 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.3 | 20.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,970 |
Dana 24 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24: the short version
- The Dana 24 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 are close in length (24.2 ft7.36 m vs 24.1 ft7.35 m ).
- The Dana 24 is heavier, displacing about 81% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.9 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dana 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dana 24 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 1.89).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.