Dana 24 vs Seidelmann 245
How do the Dana 24 and Seidelmann 245 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dana 24 
Seidelmann 245 | Dana 24 | Seidelmann 245 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.2 ft7.36 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Waterline length | 21.4 ft6.53 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Beam | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Displacement | 7,400 lb3,357 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 1,300 lb590 kg |
| Sail area | 360 ft²33.4 m² | 267 ft²24.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.17 | 20.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 336 | 155 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.3 | 13.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
Dana 24 vs Seidelmann 245: the short version
- The Dana 24 and Seidelmann 245 are close in length (24.2 ft7.36 m vs 24.2 ft7.37 m ).
- The Dana 24 is heavier, displacing about 147% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Seidelmann 245 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dana 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dana 24 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.