DC‐14 Phantom vs Hunter 140
How do the DC‐14 Phantom and Hunter 140 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
DC‐14 Phantom | DC‐14 Phantom | Hunter 140 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.2 ft4.32 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Draft | 2.2 ft0.66 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 350 lb159 kg | 225 lb102 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 140 ft²13.0 m² | 102 ft²9.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 45.10 | 44.12 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.79 | 3.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
DC‐14 Phantom vs Hunter 140: the short version
- The DC‐14 Phantom and Hunter 140 are close in length (14.2 ft4.32 m vs 14.0 ft4.27 m ).
- The DC‐14 Phantom is heavier, displacing about 56% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the DC‐14 Phantom carries the more powerful rig (45.1 vs 44.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the DC‐14 Phantom rates better for offshore work (3.79 vs 3.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.