Designers Choice vs Drascombe Scaffie
How do the Designers Choice and Drascombe Scaffie compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Designers Choice | Designers Choice | Drascombe Scaffie | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.9 ft4.53 m | 14.8 ft4.50 m |
| Waterline length | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.3 ft3.75 m |
| Beam | 6.1 ft1.85 m | 5.7 ft1.75 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 1.2 ft0.37 m |
| Displacement | 315 lb143 kg | 463 lb210 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 120 ft²11.1 m² | 100 ft²9.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 41.47 | 26.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 68 | 111 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.3 | 5.3 |
| Capsize screening | 3.57 | 2.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.8 | 4.7 |
Designers Choice vs Drascombe Scaffie: the short version
- The Designers Choice and Drascombe Scaffie are close in length (14.9 ft4.53 m vs 14.8 ft4.50 m ).
- The Drascombe Scaffie is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Designers Choice carries the more powerful rig (41.5 vs 26.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Drascombe Scaffie scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Drascombe Scaffie rates better for offshore work (2.97 vs 3.57).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.