Diamond Head vs Jaguar Mach 2
How do the Diamond Head and Jaguar Mach 2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Diamond Head | Diamond Head | Jaguar Mach 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 12.8 ft3.90 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 1.9 ft0.59 m | 2.2 ft0.68 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 22 lb10 kg | 44 lb20 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.77 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Diamond Head vs Jaguar Mach 2: the short version
- The Diamond Head and Jaguar Mach 2 are close in length (12.8 ft3.91 m vs 12.8 ft3.90 m ).
- The Jaguar Mach 2 is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Jaguar Mach 2 rates better for offshore work (2.53 vs 2.77).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.