Dickerson 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend
How do the Dickerson 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dickerson 37 | Dickerson 37 | Hunter 37.5 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.79 m | 31.8 ft9.68 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 15,950 lb7,235 kg | 16,400 lb7,439 kg |
| Ballast | 5,850 lb2,654 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 556 ft²51.7 m² | 704 ft²65.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.04 | 17.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 297 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.5 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.6 |
Dickerson 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend: the short version
- The Dickerson 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 37.5 Legend carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dickerson 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dickerson 37 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.