Dickerson 41 vs Newport 41
How do the Dickerson 41 and Newport 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dickerson 41 | Dickerson 41 | Newport 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.0 ft12.50 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 12.5 ft3.81 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 24,500 lb11,113 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | 8,500 lb3,856 kg | 8,215 lb3,726 kg |
| Sail area | 753 ft²70.0 m² | 741 ft²68.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.28 | 17.26 |
| Displacement / Length | 350 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 38.1 | 33.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.3 |
Dickerson 41 vs Newport 41: the short version
- The Dickerson 41 and Newport 41 are close in length (41.0 ft12.50 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- The Dickerson 41 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Newport 41 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dickerson 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Newport 41 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.72).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.