Dione 98 vs Gougeon 32
How do the Dione 98 and Gougeon 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dione 98 | Dione 98 | Gougeon 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.26 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.13 m | 8.3 ft2.53 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 6,834 lb3,100 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Sail area | 394 ft²36.6 m² | 296 ft²27.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.51 | 44.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 15 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 3.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 3.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.6 |
Dione 98 vs Gougeon 32: the short version
- The Dione 98 and Gougeon 32 are close in length (32.0 ft9.75 m vs 32.0 ft9.75 m ).
- The Dione 98 is heavier, displacing about 521% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Gougeon 32 carries the more powerful rig (44.4 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dione 98 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dione 98 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 3.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.