Dione 98 vs Mirage 32
How do the Dione 98 and Mirage 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dione 98 | Dione 98 | Mirage 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.26 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.13 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 6,834 lb3,100 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Sail area | 394 ft²36.6 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.51 | 17.32 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 203 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Dione 98 vs Mirage 32: the short version
- The Dione 98 and Mirage 32 are close in length (32.0 ft9.75 m vs 32.0 ft9.75 m ).
- The Mirage 32 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Dione 98 carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirage 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirage 32 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.