D&M 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22
How do the D&M 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
D&M 22 | D&M 22 | Falmouth Cutter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.57 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,775 lb1,259 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 1,000 lb454 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Sail area | 254 ft²23.6 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.58 | 13.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 366 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.7 | 33.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.40 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.1 |
D&M 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22: the short version
- The D&M 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 is heavier, displacing about 167% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the D&M 22 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Falmouth Cutter 22 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.