D&M 22 vs Rocket 22
How do the D&M 22 and Rocket 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
D&M 22 | D&M 22 | Rocket 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.57 m | 8.5 ft2.58 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 2,775 lb1,259 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Ballast | 1,000 lb454 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 254 ft²23.6 m² | 313 ft²29.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.58 | 36.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 72 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.7 | 6.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.40 | 2.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.2 |
D&M 22 vs Rocket 22: the short version
- The D&M 22 and Rocket 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The D&M 22 is heavier, displacing about 73% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Rocket 22 carries the more powerful rig (36.6 vs 20.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The D&M 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the D&M 22 rates better for offshore work (2.40 vs 2.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.