Dobbelman DB2 C vs Reel 300
How do the Dobbelman DB2 C and Reel 300 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dobbelman DB2 C | Dobbelman DB2 C | Reel 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.7 ft3.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.63 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 37 lb17 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.48 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Dobbelman DB2 C vs Reel 300: the short version
- The Dobbelman DB2 C and Reel 300 are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.7 ft3.88 m ).
- The Reel 300 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dobbelman DB2 C rates better for offshore work (2.48 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.