Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 vs Reel 300
How do the Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 and Reel 300 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 | Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 | Reel 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.7 ft3.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.64 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 37 lb17 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.52 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 vs Reel 300: the short version
- The Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 and Reel 300 are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.7 ft3.88 m ).
- The Reel 300 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.