Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 vs Reel Racer 340
How do the Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 and Reel Racer 340 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 | Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 | Reel Racer 340 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.64 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 37 lb17 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.52 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 vs Reel Racer 340: the short version
- The Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 and Reel Racer 340 are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.8 ft3.89 m ).
- The Reel Racer 340 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.