Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 vs Reel SP
How do the Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 and Reel SP compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 | Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 | Reel SP | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.7 ft3.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.64 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 37 lb17 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.52 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 vs Reel SP: the short version
- The Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 and Reel SP are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.7 ft3.88 m ).
- The Reel SP is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.