Dockrell 37 vs Hinterhoeller F3
How do the Dockrell 37 and Hinterhoeller F3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dockrell 37 | Dockrell 37 | Hinterhoeller F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.5 ft11.13 m | 36.4 ft11.08 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Draft | 7.5 ft2.29 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Displacement | 16,000 lb7,257 kg | 10,900 lb4,944 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,730 lb2,599 kg |
| Sail area | 492 ft²45.7 m² | 630 ft²58.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.40 | 20.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 265 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 35.2 | 19.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 2.13 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.3 |
Dockrell 37 vs Hinterhoeller F3: the short version
- The Dockrell 37 and Hinterhoeller F3 are close in length (36.5 ft11.13 m vs 36.4 ft11.08 m ).
- The Dockrell 37 is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hinterhoeller F3 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dockrell 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dockrell 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.