Dolphin 15 Senior vs Hunter 146
How do the Dolphin 15 Senior and Hunter 146 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Dolphin 15 Senior | Hunter 146 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Waterline length | 13.5 ft4.11 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Draft | 1.5 ft0.47 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 170 lb77 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 85 ft²7.9 m² | 92 ft²8.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.32 | 30.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 31 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 2.2 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.67 | 3.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.9 | — |
Dolphin 15 Senior vs Hunter 146: the short version
- The Dolphin 15 Senior and Hunter 146 are close in length (14.5 ft4.42 m vs 14.5 ft4.42 m ).
- The Hunter 146 is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Dolphin 15 Senior carries the more powerful rig (44.3 vs 30.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dolphin 15 Senior rates better for offshore work (3.67 vs 3.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.