Douglas 32 vs Gougeon 32
How do the Douglas 32 and Gougeon 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Douglas 32 
Gougeon 32 | Douglas 32 | Gougeon 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.1 ft9.78 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 8.3 ft2.53 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 11,500 lb5,216 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Sail area | 459 ft²42.6 m² | 296 ft²27.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.41 | 44.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 15 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.1 | 3.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 3.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.6 |
Douglas 32 vs Gougeon 32: the short version
- The Douglas 32 and Gougeon 32 are close in length (32.1 ft9.78 m vs 32.0 ft9.75 m ).
- The Douglas 32 is heavier, displacing about 945% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Gougeon 32 carries the more powerful rig (44.4 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Douglas 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Douglas 32 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 3.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.