Douglas 32 vs Hunter 32 Vision
How do the Douglas 32 and Hunter 32 Vision compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Douglas 32 
Hunter 32 Vision | Douglas 32 | Hunter 32 Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.1 ft9.78 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 11,500 lb5,216 kg | 11,400 lb5,171 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 459 ft²42.6 m² | 486 ft²45.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.41 | 15.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.1 | 24.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.0 |
Douglas 32 vs Hunter 32 Vision: the short version
- The Douglas 32 and Hunter 32 Vision are close in length (32.1 ft9.78 m vs 32.0 ft9.75 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 32 Vision carries the more powerful rig (15.4 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Douglas 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Douglas 32 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.