Dovekie 21 vs Hunter 216
How do the Dovekie 21 and Hunter 216 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dovekie 21 | Dovekie 21 | Hunter 216 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.4 ft6.53 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 18.8 ft5.72 m |
| Beam | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 600 lb272 kg | 1,351 lb613 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 500 lb227 kg |
| Sail area | 143 ft²13.3 m² | 208 ft²19.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.16 | 27.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 39 | 91 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.8 | 6.8 |
| Capsize screening | 3.16 | 2.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Dovekie 21 vs Hunter 216: the short version
- The Dovekie 21 and Hunter 216 are close in length (21.4 ft6.53 m vs 21.5 ft6.55 m ).
- The Hunter 216 is heavier, displacing about 125% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Dovekie 21 carries the more powerful rig (32.2 vs 27.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 216 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 216 rates better for offshore work (2.86 vs 3.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.