Dovekie 21 vs Junker 22
How do the Dovekie 21 and Junker 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dovekie 21 | Dovekie 21 | Junker 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.4 ft6.53 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 18.0 ft5.50 m |
| Beam | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | —— |
| Displacement | 600 lb272 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 143 ft²13.3 m² | 205 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.16 | 16.26 |
| Displacement / Length | 39 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.8 | 19.0 |
| Capsize screening | 3.16 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.7 |
| Average used price | — | €1,500 |
Dovekie 21 vs Junker 22: the short version
- The Dovekie 21 and Junker 22 are close in length (21.4 ft6.53 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- The Junker 22 is heavier, displacing about 378% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Dovekie 21 carries the more powerful rig (32.2 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Junker 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Junker 22 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 3.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.